"Change is the process by which the future invades our lives".
"The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn".
In the world of futurist, Alvin Toffler, along with his wife Heidi, represent the proverbial 800 pound gorilla. Above are a couple of his statements to which you should take to heart.
In 1980, while I was attending college at St. Mary's University in San Antonio, Texas, Alvin Toffler released his book The Third Wave. Following up on his book Future Shock, it was a book that profoundly changed my outlook on the World and my future in it.
Before there were personal computers on every desk, table and lap, and before there was wide knowledge of the Internet, Toffler predicted the digital revolution, the communications revolution, the corporate revolution and technological singularity. This later term represents an "event horizon" in which the predictability of human technological development extends past that which present models of the future cease to give us predicability or accurate answers. This is followed by strong increases in artificial intelligence and an amplification of human intelligence.
Toffler's book described three different types of societies, which he referred to as "waves". Each of these waves pushes the older societies and cultures aside. The First Wave, which has long been pushed aside for most of us, is the society established after the agrarian revolution, which replaced the first hunter-gatherer cultures.
The Second Wave, in which many of America's people are still floundering, is represented by what has been called the "industrial revolution". The main components of the Second Wave are the nuclear family, factory-type eduction, and the corporation, all of which are based upon standardization, centralization, concentration and synchonization, and bureaucracy.
The Third Wave is upon us and is also refered to as the "post-industrial" society and the "information age". This society is represented by "subcults" or diverse lifestyles, "adhocracies" or fluid organizations that adapt quickly to change, and where information begins to substitute for most material resources. As to the later point, information becomes the main material for workers, each of which are only loosely affiliated. Mass production is replaced by mass customization; offering personalized and cheaper goods, services. Most importantly the gap between what has been producers and consumers begins to be bridged by technology creating a class of "prosumers" that can fill the own needs. We see this today in the way of open source software, assembly kit furniture, and freelance work, such as legal services.
The test of time has shown Alvin Toffler to be mainly right in his predictions. Nowhere, I believe, is this more profound than in the practice of law, the type or style of which I and others have decided to pursue. Hence, I have taken the liberty of coining our type of firm as "Third Wave law firms" or "Third Wave practices". We work from our homes or from cubicles or small shared offices free from the confines of standardization, centralization, concentration, synchonization and bureaucracy, which has primarily contributed to the disatisfaction of lawyers with the practice of law. We live, support and fight for diverse lifestyles. We do not employ other lawyers or staff so much as we operate within these adhocracies or fluid organizations in which we as attorneys and firms come together only to work on specific cases or tasks. In other words, we are freelancers. We survive not on libraries, expensive associates, in-house computer systems, and highrise offices of marble and mahogany, but off the Internet, online research, and information. In short, we do what attorneys were programned to do -- we collect information, process information, analyze information, repackage information, and sell it in packages or in a means to make the lives of ordinary people and organizations better. Shorter still, Third Wave law firms and lawyers provide personalization and mass customization of the law for the consumer or prosumer in a more cost effective manner.
How you might ask how this is possible, and/or how may I establish a Third Wave law firm?
First, refuse to maintain traditional offices that most consumers typically associate with law firms. Eliminate all waiting rooms for clients to cool their heals; get rid of the receptionist area in which to ignore the client; empty all meeting rooms used for client visits; go paperless and close the file room in which to lose files; forego all of your printed texts and shut down your law library, get rid of you messy private office and move home; remove your licenses and diplomas from the wall (after all we hang these only to impress ourselves), quit going to the law firm rec room to chat with staff over coffee and donuts, and, remove your shingle from all buildings. You must start going about your business from where you are..wherever you are...everywhere you are. As an attorney you must refuse to be confined by time, space and the restrictions that a typical law office employs. Finally, you have got to fire or redirect your palace guards that are keeping you broke and away from the consumer. Start answering your own phones, read and respond to your own email, faxes and mail, and maintain your own schedule.
How do you, as a Third Wave law firm, accomplish such a thing?
You've got to be the king of the Internet. You have got to use email, Internet telephony, Internet faxing, electronic case filing, and Internet research, both to and from computers and other devices. ( If you are already doing so you must certainly have figured out by now that you do not need all of these other people and offices to make a good living for yourself). There is virtually no one that cannot be reached, and no document that cannot be received or delivered, by phone, fax, email or (if no other alternative) mail any place in the State of Texas or the world. By staying connected you can tear down the barriers that keep you from our clients and their objective. Hence, customization, personalization, leads to a job well done and it is rewarded.
If you have already taken a step to creating a Third Wave law firm or practice, I will ask you to email me and let me know. I would like to communicate with you and feature you on this blawg site.
Congratulations on this brilliant piece. I have been teaching "How to Hang a Shingle Right Out of Law School" at Quinnipiac University School of Law since 2000 and this is EXACTLY my philosophy but I present it as "You are the Product" eveything else is overhead and by minimizing your overhead you have freedom to design your personal and professional life. Take advantage of all technology has to offer and it is the great equalizer. You can earn less and take home more, put in less hours and take home more of each dollar by practicing law intelligently. Brilliant. Bravo!
Posted by: Susan Cartier Liebel | October 25, 2006 at 08:15 AM
I absolutely love your philosophy! As a law student, this is precisely the sort of thing I've wanted to do my entire life. I've puzzled about why one couldn't work from the back of a car or their own home and experience freedom while _also_ providing your clients with top notch service. Everyone I know is stampeding towards big law firms right now, so it's good to know that I'm not alone, that my future plans aren't impossible dreams.
Posted by: Chris Lee | January 23, 2007 at 01:48 AM
As a 50 year old former personal injury trial attorney who stepped away for the past 7 years, I am thrilled to know that this can be done. Thank you!
Posted by: Sandy Slaga | February 25, 2007 at 07:11 PM
I've operated a solo law practice out of my house since my twins were born in 2004. I think it is an especially appealing type of practice for young attorneys with kids. I love the way you put what I do - I truly operate virtually anywhere and everywhere. When faced with the prospect of going back to traditional law practice, I shudder! I just launched a new website and blog (I find myself sucked into the blogoshpere lately - I'm at www.kroliklegal.com).
Posted by: Linsey | September 12, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Chuck,
I'm sitting in the attorney ready room in the criminal courthouse, reading your blog on my laptop with a wireless internet connection, thinking: yeah, that's about right!
With a criminal trial practice, not everything can be done virtually . . . I can't fax in a closing argument, and can't pick a jury by phone. But since I started practicing 12 years ago I've done my best to minimize overhead, and minimizing overhead has largely meant virtualizing the office.
Posted by: Mark Bennett | September 25, 2007 at 10:18 AM
Thank you for that informative piece. I am taking a break from studying for the February bar tonight. Your thoughts challenged and encouraged me.
Posted by: Jim Schroeder | December 22, 2007 at 09:30 PM
I stumbled across this blog while browsing around and it is perfectly on point for these times. I will add you to my blawgroll as soon as I can.
I write about lawyering, virtual lawyering,virtual law firms at my elawyering blog at http://www.elawyeringredux.com I think you will find that we have a lot in common.
Posted by: Richard Granat | December 20, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Wow; this is so timely for me. I'm a bankruptcy-consumer lawyer currently working for peanuts in a small skyscraper firm where at 46, I'm the "young whippersnapper" of the firm.
Everything about the place is perpetually "1985" -- its like stepping back into a time machine.
Lately, I've been seriously considering a change of scenery. Your post is exactly where my head is at this point.
But I do have a question: what do you say to the argument that it doesn't make business sense to have attorneys doing secretarial and administrative work? I mean, should we really be typing our own docs, making our own copies, answering our own phones, etc., etc.?
Just recently I spent the better part of an entire day assembling trial exhibits -- making copies, tabbing, etc. Does that make any sense?
I'd love to hear your point of view.
http://alcinousbanquet.blogspot.com
Posted by: fbc | December 22, 2008 at 10:46 AM
I did this pretty much from the start. My web site does well and I am totally mobile. Money is not the problem. This model worked for me, but it has it's problems. They are the same problems as more traditional firms encounter. Clients, judges, opposing counsel - all present challenges to my sanity. The rapid ease of electronic communication only exacerbates these problems. Success is easy, sanity not so much. Be careful what you wish for, because when you do this and it works it comes with a whole other bag of challenges.
Posted by: David A. Huntoon | May 04, 2009 at 10:03 PM
I think that in theory this sounds great. In practice, however, I've found it to be a bit problematic. Clients want to be able to meet with you face to face at least once or twice during a representation, and meeting them at Starbucks or in your home office doesn't do much to impress them. Clients like to see the incidents of success and often associate a nice office with a successful, knowledgeable professional. Whether right or wrong, that's their impression. When they request a meeting and you suggest Starbucks at the corner of 5th and Main, they immediately figure you and your services are second rate. That's not what they want, and it's not good for business. This has been my primary obstacle in going "third wave." Any thoughts?
Posted by: Steve Tucker | November 29, 2009 at 01:54 PM
I have the same problem and, through much searching, found an affordable virtual office ($95 a month). I even found one upscale "office" that rents meeting/conference room space on a per-use basis. When I had an office, I found that half of my clients had no problem with NEVER coming to the office. So I spent most of my time alone at $500+ per month. This saves me approx. $5,000 a year.
Posted by: A. Albert | December 30, 2009 at 04:23 PM
A Virtual Assistant is very in demand business today. It helps a lot in online business services and it's more cheaper.
Posted by: Bob | January 30, 2010 at 12:24 PM
I have lived the life of a Third Wave lawyer for 14 years, and would not trade it for a traditional law office, for anything! My only departure from your definition is the whole "diplomas on the wall" thing. When I put them up 14 years ago, it was because I didn't think people would believe I was an attorney, otherwise. Now, as I repaint my office, I find that I don't care whether people believe I'm an attorney. Will replace diplomas with nice artwork.
Thanks for the validation!
Posted by: Miriam Robeson | April 28, 2010 at 11:44 AM
I personally do not believe it makes good business sense for an attorney to spend ANY of their time doing administrative tasks.
Along with Third Wave attorneys, there are Third Wave virtual assistants, Third Wave paralegals, and Third Wave legal experts - all of whom, in one way or another, believe in the philosophy of providing quality legal services in a "more cost effective manner" and in a work environment that they can design themselves.
Just think of the amazing potential for Third Wave (virtual) legal work teams!
Pam Hunter, Legal Virtual Assistant
www.creativeofficeservice.com
Posted by: Pamela Hunter | September 15, 2010 at 09:49 AM
This is what you call the new technology of attorney's. No more classical way of having in the office all the time.
Posted by: Social Media Management | April 29, 2012 at 04:27 AM