I hear lawyers every day complaining about the inability to find law jobs, or to find a law job they imagined for themselves, or to find a law job that pays enough money given their student loans and the costs of living. So, they flounder. By this I mean they make no money, or they work themselves to death and make little money, or practice in areas of the law that does not excite them. And, then we get to hear about all of the dissatisfaction of young lawyers in the practice of law, in their law school
education, in the economy, etc.
From one perspective anyway, it is all a bunch of hogwash. Look, some people are just not going to be pleased. But, bad economy or not, many practice areas, such as bankruptcy, collections, and child support, increase in slow times. For those areas that follow the economy down, such as real estate, what better time to prepare for the coming upturn. After all, established attorneys have a lot to lose, but for a new attorney every case is an increase in business and an improvement.
Law schools are to blame in one part. They do not prepare lawyers for this prospect. This is because doing so would affect their rankings.
There is just no evidence to support that law graduates today are less interested in having their own practice, or that the urge to venture out on one's own increases with practice experience.
There is some evidence that shows that lack of money for starting a practice is a major deterrent. It should not be. Sure it is nice to have something coming in every couple of weeks whether the lawyer performs or not. But, if a young lawyer is not earning enough now, or cannot find a job, or hates what has to be done to maintain a small amount of cashflow, then how does this argument really relate?
The truth of the matter is that it can cost almost nothing to start a new practice, apart from what a lawyer likely already has at his or her disposal. Sure, there are a lot of people out there that want to sell things that make it more expensive, but it need not be so. Additional space, staff, consultants, accountants, research tools and the like are not really needed starting out. All a lawyer really needs are clients and cases. That really does not take a lot of money as it takes a degree of tenacity and a willingness not to shy away from success.
As for the lack of experience argument, that is more daunting. Just understand that business knowledge and practice knowledge are not learned in law school. They are learned by doing. Another way of saying it is that the only way a lawyer is going to learn is to just dive into the practice and practice area and start doing. I understand that thought is not overly enjoyable, but my point is that it is not any more enjoyable working for someone else. All most law firms do anyway is to throw a young attorney into the pool and command them to swim. It is not as if they first put them through some private course of study on swimming. Sure, there are more experienced hands around should a new attorney need them, but those hands are available whether or not the attorney is with an existing firm. In fact, a lawyer probably has more access to such knowledge and experience if not associated with one firm, and if the lawyer is just willing to ask.
Brava, Chuck. It's not an unfamiliar refrain but one which needs to be sung periodically to those who still try to plug their ears!!
Posted by: Susan Cartier Liebel | July 11, 2010 at 06:54 PM
Chuck,
Excellent post. I definitely do not regret going solo. In fact, "humbly" speaking, I believe that I am further along than my colleagues who landed firm jobs. A handful of them have not been retained by the firm after their initial 2nd or 3rd year.
Other solo attorneys have been extremely helpful in the process, and as you stated, you can start your own practice with minimum start-up costs. My big break came when I found an experienced solo attorney who needed an "of counsel" lawyer to handle some of his case overflow. Of course we split the fees, but my work with him resulted in clients referring me to their friends, family, and co-workers.
Posted by: NC Injury Lawyer | July 16, 2010 at 12:39 PM
Young lawyers might need to look farther than their resident big city to find a location for their solo practice. I am a solo in a rural county with fewer than 20 attorneys in the county (including judges). I have as much work as I can handle. Over the past 10 years, 3 attorneys have died and one has retired (not unexpected in a bar association with an average age of over 60). Three new attorneys have ventured into our community to try their hands at solo practice, and I cheerfully refer as much work to them as possible. Two of the three have been rotated on to part-time government counsel positions, which should provide a few dollars of steady income while they build their practice. One is running for County Prosecutor this term. Another is picking up a good bit of court-appointed defense work.
The point is, there may be far greater opportunities in a small community (particularly with an older bar association) than in an urban setting.
Small communities have much to offer, despite the perceived lack of "big-city" amenities. Our local bar association is very welcoming to new faces. I've had coffee chats with the new attorneys over everything from how to navigate the courthouse to which cell phone provider is the best, and I'm glad to share.
Posted by: Miriam Robeson | July 16, 2010 at 02:59 PM
Comment number one to Rule 1:1 of the rules of professional conduct, as adopted by many states, imposes a significant restriction on a new laywer who might accet a matter. Specifically, before a new law may take a case, that lawyer must determine "whether it is feasible to refer the matter to, or associate or consult with, a lawyer of established competence in the field in question."
My reading of thise is that a new lawyer must refer out cases if he or she can find an older attorney who will take the case or that new lawyer must be an associate under an experience attorney. A new lawyer who is not an associate under an experience lawyer may not take a case if there are other experienced lawyers who could conceviably take on the case.
The trick is that it makes no sense for an experience attorney to take on an associate in this economic environment if young lawyers are obligated to refer their potential matters to that experience lawyer anyway. Therefore, some of us who have not been accpted as an associate under an experience lawyer do not start practices because of this obligation to refer any new matters out if there are other experienced lawyer admitted to practice in the jurisdiction.
Posted by: Boyd | January 12, 2013 at 01:24 PM