You know me. I think the amount of space that lawyers need to do their work is exaggerated. It is more ego than necessity, and it leads to a cluttered and complicated life. But, a quiet dedicated work space is good. If you do not have room in your home, then try building a space in back or close to your home. It might be a little industrial shabby chic, but throw in some windows and some planting and you are good to go.
In Berkeley, California Karl Wanaselja, along with his business partner and wife Cate Leger, created their home-office using an old refrigerated shipping container that cost just $1,800. They cut their 40' long refrigerated unit in half and placed it in a T shape in their backyard. Because it was a refrigerated container, they did not need to add any insulation. Using a reciprocating saw, the couple cut huge windows into the aluminum/stainless steel structure.
Or, maybe the problem is that law schools did promise their applicants a rose garden.
Maybe not in so many words, but there is a lot of commotion these days about what many believe is fudging by law schools on their employment numbers upon their students graduating.
I, myself, have complained for some time on a more anecdotal basis on what I see as blatant law school lying so as to improve their rankings.
For example, I can tell you when my daughter graduated from law school, the famed placement office at the University of Houston Law Center did nothing more than refer her to Martindale.Com to look for a job. They tauted the promise of their placement office going in, and then did nothing either during or at the end of law school to really help, other than their counselors drawing their paychecks (paid for by substantial tuition increases).
(On a side note, if law schools are willing to find creative ways to fib about potential employment numbers, they are even more likely to find ways to fib about LSAT scores making the entire ranking process itself a sham).
The ranking process has created, in my mind, a terrible situation in which schools, wishing to compete, spend millions of dollars to fudge up their rankings (thereby causing an unnecessary increase in tuition, as well as student and graduate poverty), and create a kind of culture of lying, which is a remedy passed along to too many of its graduates.
Law schools need to be cheaper in tuition, and they need to be impeccably honest. They need to dedicate themselves to a value education (which includes very much the cheapest cost of obtaining a law degree), and they need to tell U.S. News were to stick their rankings.
1st Tier? 2nd Tier? 4th Tier? No tier? Who cares?
The only thing that matters and should matter is the costs to students to become lawyers and the bar passage rate. In short, are you more likely than not to stay solvent as a result of your education, and you will be able to practice law when you graduate?
So, I recognize and have agonized about the state of our law schools more than most. But, to those that use this as an excuse to say that a legal education is not worthwhile, you are simply wrong. I am equally as tired of seeing posts that suggest that a legal education or the legal profession, as a result, is a sham.
Law school is a valuable and beneficial education, even if you never end up practicing law. My sister, for example, has a law degree and works for the VA.
There are problems, not the least of which are law schools that refuse to accept good students just because they have not mastered the meaningless LSAT. Speaking of NYLS, Cooley and Thomas Jefferson, they provide access to motivated students who want to be lawyers. Did they over promise? Did they promise people a rose garden? Maybe. I do not know. Do they charge too much? That is a problem for most every law school these days. But, Cooley and New York Law School have good bar passage rates, which is a figure that cannot be easily fudged, and Thomas Jefferson competes in the state with the most difficult bar exam to pass.
These schools fill needs.
In law we learn that disclosure is everything, and that is obviously where the problem lies. Law is very much an entrepreneurial profession. Schools have become too much like late night infomercials in regard to selling their benefits. The actual benefits are great. You get a profession and possibly live a rewarding life. You get an opportunity to succeed -- not a guarantee.
Law schools do not necessarily paint too rosy of picture as they emphasize the wrong things. They sell everyone like they will be the upper 10% of the graduates in law school without giving them any of the tools or information to understand the likelihood of the possibility. Let's just say that 90% of all students cannot be in the top 10%. Law schools give too little training to the lower 90% on what it will take for each to start and build their own law practices or other entrepreneurial endeavor. Despite touting clinics, there is very little practical training in law schools.
In the meantime, although it dates me considerably, maybe everyone should listen to Lynn Anderson, below.
Google's promotional video for the +1 button, above, explains the social feature thusly: "When you click +1, you're telling your friends, your family and the rest of the world, 'this is something you should check out!'"
I guess, then, the Google +1 button is similar to Facebook's "Like" button, which I have always thought a bit strange when you push "Like" as to something that is terrible. You post that you were just involved in a tradgic accident, and one of your friends clicks the "Like" button.
Instead of your "Likes" being posted to your Facebook profile, your +1's are collected in your Google profile and displayed when people within your Google social circle search for something you have recommended.
Here is how I think it works, if you opt in via Google Labs, you'll see a translucent +1 button appear to the right of your Google search results. When you mouse over the button, it becomes solid and you can click it. Each +1 is logged in your Google profile. There, you can manage what you've +1'd and choose whether or not you want to make this information public.
I do not know really how this benefits a law firm or lawyer except to ad the +1 button to your posts on your blog.
Enjoy the CNET video below concerning a poll in which iPad owners state what they can live without now that they own an iPad. You will notice I placed this video under category of "fun and humor" because although I think that tablets will eventually revolutionize the tech market, there is a lot of evolution that needs to take place before that happens. What I tend to love about Apple Kool-Aid drinkers is that these are the same people that must have believed in Obama or the Tea Party. They just want to believe so badly that they project their hopes and dreams on the product whether deserved or, for that matter, factual. They tend to check reality at the door.
I am a big fan of using shipping containers to build a modest law office in a way that is cheap, innovative, green, quick and useful. People what to work at or near their home. Lawyers want some personal or dedicated space to do this. Although the studio of an artist and DJ, such things can also represent law office space. Enjoy the video below.
What Carolyn Elefant does in this video is outline the combination of core competencies that will make a solo or small law firm great -- maybe not immediately, but eventually. The presentation is short, but it is really to the point. It is worth your attention. The bottom line for me, in regard to the old line law practice, is that you have got to ditch it, niche it and pitch it.
The opinions expressed in this weblog represent only the opinions of the author(s) and are in no way intended as legal advice upon which you should rely. Every person's situation is different and requires an attorney to review the situation personally with you.
CERTIFICATION.
NOT CERTIFIED BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION.
LICENSES.
Charles (Chuck) Newton is licensed to practice law in all courts in the State of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and all United States District Court and Bankruptcy Courts in the State of Texas.
NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP CREATED.
This weblog does not create an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can only be accomplished by execution of an agreement between Charles Newton & Associates and a prospective client.
Recent Comments